Sunday, January 29, 2012


See below Winnipeg Free Press editorial. I do not understand why anyone is surprised, this has been going on for years: convicted and alleged terrorists, murderers, criminals, and other unsavoury characters have found a way to use Canada as a place where they can stall the rule of law and the wheels of justice. And to add injury to insult, they get the taxpayers to pick up the tab for their legal fight through legal aid. This is very concerning indeed. It makes a mockery of Canada.

It is time to change the nonsensical policy of allowing years of court battles at taxpayers expense, and to deny the use of Canada to international thugs. Incidentally, I would like to know who paid the legal fees for Leon Mugesera over all the years he was in Canada, and whether he collected any social assistance or other benefits during that time, and find a way to force him to repay those costs. The use of legal aid should be public information and excempt from privacy legislation.

Canada risks being seen as pandering to mass murders - Winnipeg Free Press

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Canada risks being seen as pandering to mass murders
By: The Red Deer Advocate

Posted: 01/28/2012 1:00 AM

Here's an ethical dilemma for you: does a person who may face torture deserve more compassion than hundreds of thousands of innocent murder victims?

Apparently Canada's immigration laws can't make a distinction or, if it does, seems to consider the threat of torture more inhumane. At least that seems the case by allowing an alleged killer to gain protection in Canada against punishment for his possible involvement in one of the biggest mass murders in modern history.

Our immigration rules afforded freedom to Leon Mugesera, who is accused in his homeland of Rwanda as being one of the trigger men the 1994 genocide that saw a 100-day massacre claim about one million Tutsis and Hutus.

Mugesera fought his deportation through the seemingly endless court proceedings that are entitled to him under our laws. His luck finally ran out on Monday, when the courts ordered him on a plane to Rwanda at Montreal's Pierre Elliott Trudeau Airport.

The sticking point during the laborious proceedings was that Mugesera could face torture if returned.

This country has been reluctant to deport suspected criminals, on "ethical grounds," no matter how serious their crimes. Torture and the death penalty are among the reasons.

But, essentially, it means we apply our standards of justice to other countries through our immigration process.

Serial killer Charles Ng, who evaded California authorities for the sex-torture murders of between 11 and 25 people by sneaking into Canada, enjoyed the same luxury.

Ng and Leonard Lake carried out these horrific executions on Lake's California ranch in 1983 and videotaped the gruesome details. Lake committed suicide after his arrest in 1985, while Ng fled to Calgary and was captured that same year. After a lengthy extradition battle, during which Canadian authorities refused to turn him over to the U.S. because he faced a death sentence if convicted, he was finally handed over in 1998. He now sits on death row in San Quentin State Prison.

As a nation, we must take care not to gain a reputation for pandering to and protecting murderers from the justice of their own countries. It's an extremely costly process to taxpayers and, ultimately, can mean we house other nations' criminals in our prisons.

It is time we re-examined the avenues of appeal open to such criminals and alleged criminals.

In 1992, Mugesera, then a fiery political Rwandan operative, delivered a blistering speech calling the Tutsis "cockroaches" and urging their extermination. Shorty after the speech, he was charged with inciting hatred and fled to Canada for protection.

While a handful of Mugesera's Canadian supporters wept at the airport on Monday, Rwandan authorities applauded Canada's decision, saying it was "the right thing."

No comments: